While reading the on-line edition of who-give-a-shit-daily, I ran into this article."It's cost me over $400,000" to fight the lawsuit, Don Kirlin told the paper, "and after spending it, I only get to lose 12 percent of my property that I already owned."
City of Quincy has spent over $400,000 to fight the firing of 6 city employees and after spending it, They only have to re-hire 33 percent of the employees that they already fired.
11 comments:
Ha! Great comparison. Welcome to Quincy, where we like to pretend we're a big city by paying big city lawyers.
Any way a second counter like "servergate" can be started to see how long it takes for the city to reply on Murphy's latest deal? Bet Murphy wished he didn't go to the cops now!
lawyers aid and abet the their clients.
...as in the city hired lawyers aid the city by not working on city business and bloging about shit they should have handled ???
True
True
Notice you don't see Senors Badass(what a joke) spouting off anymore after the feds bailed his banking group out, making him a true communist......
He claims to be an R, but he sure likes cashing his welfare funded paycheck.
Don't work for a bank. Not even really sure what you mean by "his banking group". Probably a bad guess on your part.
My paycheck comes directly from people who pay my firm, not any company. Got nothing from the bailout.
Just felt that, if Oracle is going to start posting unfunny Onion-type weak crap, I might take a break myself. It's not much fun with anon posters like you, as it is hard to keep a conversation going when you can't keep track of who is who. And, Oracle at least had the decency of responding, however pathetically, to posts.
Everything in your post was wrong. Except the part where you called yourself a dumbfuck.
That was spot-on.
Seanior badass is also "anonymous".
You missed the point. I don't care if someone is anonymous... just that, if they don't call themselves something, you never know who the fuck you're talking to... it's a continuity thing... not a brave vs. coward thing.
Of course "Senor Badass" is anonymous, what... you think I think that's really my name? You should be Monsieur Dumbfuckernutter, then.
Great comment... good input. Sheeesh.
Well, it is a brave vs coward thing. It's obvious why.
Either you're not positive of your own convictions, or someone has you.
THAT'S THE WAY IT IS.
Oh...um...sheesh...
You may think it is a brave/coward thing. Fair enough.
The point is, that is not what I was talking about. So, a post implying that I was hypocritical because I use a pseudonym while blasting anonymous posters misinterprets what I was saying. Again, it has to do with it being hard to follow.
The "sheesh" was in response to the inability to read something and understand it.
Also, what does this sentence mean, "Either you're not positive of your own convictions, or someone has you."? What do you mean by "someone has you"? Not being critical... just curious.
And, your opinion is not THE WAY IT IS. It is WHAT YOU BELIEVE. I have never been one to believe that a person's opinion is wrong or invalid simply because they don't tell you who they are.
A good point made by a known source is no more valid than one made by an anonymous source.
"A good point made by a known source is no more valid than one made by an anonymous source."
Sometimes that's true.
Post a Comment